Celsius abandoned its promise of transparency from its start, according to former prosecutor Shoba Pillay who was appointed as an independent examiner by United States Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn.
In a filing, Pillay stated that the bankrupt crypto firm conducted its business in a starkly different manner than how it marketed itself to its customers in every key respect.
The report claimed that Celsius lacked a sufficient risk management function and was unable to track its financial position or evaluate profitability. It also stated that Celsius and its founder Alex Mashinsky, who is currently facing fraud allegations in the United States, failed to deliver on the lavish promises.
The examiner interviewed Celsius employees, including former chief Executive Officer Alex Mashinsky, as well as customers and vendors to the company to address whether it operated a Ponzi scheme. Pillai stated that Celsius inflated its native token CEL’s price “to get the valuations to be able to sell back to the company.”
Celsius acknowledged that customer funds should not be touched to purchase the coins necessary to cover liabilities to other clients. It still went on to use customer deposits to fill the billion-dollar hole in its balance sheet. The company’s justification was that it was posting the customer deposits as collateral to borrow the necessary coins instead of selling them.
The proceeds were then used to continue the purchasing of CEL.
In April 2022, Celsius’s Coin Deployment Specialist Dean Tappen himself described the company’s practice of “using customer stablecoins” and “growing short in customer coins” to buy CEL as “very Ponzi-like.” Pillay also asserted that the employees were aware of fund discrepancies but chose to stay silent about it.
Additionally, Celsius never liquidated any of its CEL to address its liquidity needs, even as it scrambled to find liquid assets leading to June 12, 2022, when it paused all customer withdrawals.
While speaking about Mashinsky, a manager of the company was even quoted saying,
“we spent all our cash paying execs and trying to prop up alexs [sic] net worth in CEL token.”
Mashinsky, on several occasions, represented to its current and prospective customers that crypto assets belonged to them and not Celsius using phrases such as “your coins,” “my coins,” or “your crypto.” The exec completely backtracked while being interviewed by the examiner. Instead, he stated,
“100% of the actions are our actions, (the customer) can’t take any action (themselves) on the platform.”
Pillai further stated that Celsius made efforts to later edit some of the erroneous information out of the recorded AMA videos. However, it did not retract or otherwise correct any inaccurate or misleading statements made during AMAs viewed live or before any edits were implemented.
The post Celsius’ Independent Examiner Reveals Astonishing Facts About Internal Discrepancies appeared first on CryptoPotato.
—
Blog powered by G6
Disclaimer! A guest author has made this post. G6 has not checked the post. its content and attachments and under no circumstances will G6 be held responsible or liable in any way for any claims, damages, losses, expenses, costs or liabilities whatsoever (including, without limitation, any direct or indirect damages for loss of profits, business interruption or loss of information) resulting or arising directly or indirectly from your use of or inability to use this website or any websites linked to it, or from your reliance on the information and material on this website, even if the G6 has been advised of the possibility of such damages in advance.
For any inquiries, please contact [email protected]
