Today's

top partner

for CFD

The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is on its way to its second straight year of outsized returns. After generating a total return of 26.3% last year, including dividends, it’s up about 29% this year, as of this writing.

That has led some some pundits to question whether the market is becoming too frothy. Meanwhile, famed investor Warren Buffett has clearly taken notice of some elevated valuations, selling some of his top holdings and stockpiling cash.

Let’s look at two of the main issues that likely will help determine whether the stock market could crash next year.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. Valuation

By a number of measures, the S&P 500 is clearly trading at historically high valuations. Last month, Fool.com writer Sean Williams wrote a great article looking at how the index was trading at a level it has seen only three times since 1871, and each time, this was followed by a bear market.

The metric Sean looked at was the Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, which is also sometimes called the cyclically adjusted P/E ratio, or CAPE ratio. Popularized by Yale economics professor Robert Shiller, hence the name, this metric calculates earnings based on a 10-year average adjusted for inflation. The purpose of doing this is to smooth out any economic cyclicality and earnings volatility.

The S&P’s Shiller P/E ratio has only hit 38 times in two other periods: during the dot-com bubble, and early in 2022, before the market pulled back. The ratio was sitting at 38.8 times at the start of December.

Now, while the Shiller P/E ratio has predicted two past bear markets, it is worth pointing out that this is a very small sample size. It also is a backward-looking metric, while the market tends to be forward-looking.

The S&P 500 is also currently very top-heavy, with Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft representing about 20% of the index. Nvidia at about 6.8% of the index is particularly noteworthy, as its earnings per share even two years ago were very different from its earnings in 2024.

Meanwhile, many of the largest companies in the S&P are currently enjoying substantial earnings growth, which is bringing down their future price-to-earnings ratios. For example, Nvidia’s trailing-12-month P/E is 56, but its forward P/E based on next year’s analyst estimates is only 32.

NVDA PE Ratio (Forward 1y) data by YCharts

The Shiller P/E ratio doesn’t account for this explosive growth and assumes it will be cyclical. This leads to the next big factor in determining whether the market may crash next year.

2. Artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) will perhaps be the biggest determining factor whether the market continues its strong run or whether it crashes next year. While the S&P’s Shiller P/E ratio may have helped “predict” the dot-com market crash, it was a sudden and unexpected collapse in internet infrastructure spending and the creation of a lot of unviable internet-based businesses (anyone remember Pets.com?) that was ultimately one of the big reasons the market crashed. The Federal Reserve had also started raising interest rates to cool things off, while currently it’s begun cutting interest rates.

About a third of the S&P 500 is very concentrated among eight companies that are very tied to AI right now. And while the Internet boom was being led by a bunch of upstart companies in many cases, the AI boom of today is being led by extremely large, highly profitable companies that in most cases have diversified businesses.

That said, growth from these companies is being spurred by AI, and thus AI is going to be the biggest driver of the S&P in the years ahead. It starts with AI infrastructure spending. If this suddenly collapses, like what happened to Cisco during the Internet boom, then the market likely will crash.

However, this spending is currently being driven by very large, profitable tech companies that are competing to develop the best AI models they can. As long as this competition continues, it should be good for Nvidia, and by extension, the S&P. To advance AI models, companies need exponentially more and more computing power, and thus greater AI infrastructure spending.

That said, this AI spending needs to translate into growth for the big tech companies spending this money. Thus far, the companies with big cloud computing units — Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet — have seen strong revenue and operating income growth from their cloud computing segments. Now their customers also need to see strong growth from AI as well, and you are just starting to see AI-related growth ramp up in the software industry. And the software companies, in turn, need their AI solutions to save on costs and create efficiencies for their customers, including those outside the tech industry.

Right now, this still feels like things are still in the early AI innings, which is why I think the market can continue its strong run and won’t crash net year. Bull markets, on average, tend to last about 5 1/2 years, and we are only just a little more than two years into the current one.

At the end of the day, though, I think the performance of the S&P 500 is largely going to come down to how much companies are benefiting from AI and how much they are willing to spend on improving AI. Eventually the law of diminishing returns will catch up with AI and AI spending, but right now, that looks far off.

Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now?

Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $872,947!*

Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of December 9, 2024

John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Cisco Systems, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read the full story: Read More“>

Blog powered by G6

Disclaimer! A guest author has made this post. G6 has not checked the post. its content and attachments and under no circumstances will G6 be held responsible or liable in any way for any claims, damages, losses, expenses, costs or liabilities whatsoever (including, without limitation, any direct or indirect damages for loss of profits, business interruption or loss of information) resulting or arising directly or indirectly from your use of or inability to use this website or any websites linked to it, or from your reliance on the information and material on this website, even if the G6 has been advised of the possibility of such damages in advance.

For any inquiries, please contact [email protected]

G6 is free to use portal to find ways to improve your life. We choose carefully posts and partner with the best in field writers to bring you the best content. Since 2006, we are there for you on your way to success.

Find on Facebook Follow on Instagram Connect on LinkedIn

Don't miss out on latest news

Join newsletter

Enable notifications

You got a story to share? Questions?

Just connect our team and let's see

©2006-2023 - All rights reserved - GSIX.ORG

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money

All Content on this site is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Site constitutes professional and/or financial advice, nor does any information on the Site constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content on the Site before making any decisions based on such information or other Content. In exchange for using the Site, you agree not to hold G6, Lecira, its affiliates or any third party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other Content made available to you through the Site.