Today's

top partner

for CFD

South Korean authorities are intensifying their investigation into the recent hack targeting Upbit, the country’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, as evidence increasingly suggests involvement by the North Korea-linked Lazarus Group. 

Parallels to 2019-Upbit Breach: Could it be Lazarus?

According to reports from Yonhap News Agency, which cited government and industry officials, regulators are preparing an on-site inspection of the exchange as they examine the methods used in the attack.

Investigators have highlighted striking similarities between the latest exploit and an earlier attack on Upbit in 2019. Authorities said the techniques used in the 2025 breach align closely with the tactics associated with Lazarus, which was previously identified by South Korean police as the group responsible for the theft of 342,000 ETH from the exchange in November 2019.

Upbit initially froze deposits and withdrawals on Thursday after detecting abnormal activity involving Solana-based assets. The exchange later confirmed that the incident resulted in the unauthorized withdrawal of approximately 54 billion Korean won (around $36–$37 million) from a hot wallet. After further analysis, the figure was revised to roughly 44.5 billion won (about $30.4 million). 

Onchain Activity Reinforces Concerns

A government official told Yonhap that instead of direct server infiltration, the hackers likely infiltrated administrator accounts or impersonated system admins to authorize fraudulent transfers. This method of compromising or mimicking privileged credentials has strengthened investigators’ belief that the same group may once again be responsible.

Blockchain analytics firm Dethective reported that a wallet linked to the attacker quickly began converting stolen Solana into USDC before bridging the funds to Ethereum. Security experts noted that this pattern of laundering, including the use of mixers, is consistent with the methods employed by Lazarus in previous high-profile crypto thefts. Analysts also pointed to North Korea’s ongoing shortage of foreign currency as a possible motive for the operation.

Attack Coinciding With Major Corporate Merger

The timing of the breach has further fueled speculation. The attack occurred on November 27, the same day a major merger involving Upbit’s parent company, Dunamu, was officially confirmed. Naver Financial announced that Dunamu would become its wholly-owned subsidiary as part of a strategic effort to “secure future growth momentum based on digital assets.”

The coincidence raised questions about whether the date was intentionally selected. One security expert suggested to Yonhap that such timing may have been deliberate, commenting that “hackers tend to have a strong desire to show off,” and claiming that the hackers chose the day of the merger to get the most attention for their antics. 

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice

— CONTENT NOT MODERATED BY G6

G6 is free to use portal to find ways to improve your life. We choose carefully posts and partner with the best in field writers to bring you the best content. Since 2006, we are there for you on your way to success.

Find on Facebook Follow on Instagram Connect on LinkedIn

Don't miss out on latest news

Join newsletter

Enable notifications

You got a story to share? Questions?

Just connect our team and let's see

©2006-2023 - All rights reserved - GSIX.ORG

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money

All Content on this site is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Site constitutes professional and/or financial advice, nor does any information on the Site constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content on the Site before making any decisions based on such information or other Content. In exchange for using the Site, you agree not to hold G6, Lecira, its affiliates or any third party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other Content made available to you through the Site.