top partner

for CFD

Apple has been accused of non-competitive practices regarding payment methods used on their devices several times in the past.

The most notable example of the Cupertino electronics manufacturer being taken to task for these practices would be the landmark case vs. Epic Games, who eventually won the right to inform users of their app of alternative payment methods that could bypass Apple’s 30% cut of the revenue generated via Apple Pay.

Restricting Competing Wallets

In September, the giant was forced to deal with a private anti-trust lawsuit in which they were accused of abusing their dominance on Apple devices to the detriment of competing wallets. A similar investigation has also been undertaken by EU regulators. So far, their findings have not been announced.

However, a new class-action lawsuit has now been filed in California against Apple, specifically accusing the company of heavily restricting cryptocurrencies as an alternative payment method. According to the plaintiffs, Apple users are routinely subject to inflationary price hikes imposed on payment services at Apple’s discretion, with no viable alternatives.

“The iPhone is the ideal platform for mobile peer-to-peer payments. Decentralized payments would allow iPhone users to send payments to each other without any intermediary at all—and with transaction costs far lower than what Venmo, Cash App, and Apple ultimately charge to move money to and from bank accounts and credit cards. Despite the obvious utility, there is no means to make decentralized payments on the iPhone. This is because of Apple’s control over every app installed[…] through its App Store.”

Arbitrary Enforcement of Fees

According to the new lawsuit, Apple has allegedly entered anti-competitive agreements with CashApp and Venmo, peer-to-peer payment platforms run by Block and PayPal, respectively.

“These agreements limit feature competition—and the price competition that would flow from it—marketwide, including by barring the incorporation of decentralized cryptocurrency technology within existing or new iOS Peer-to-Peer Payment apps.”

Interestingly enough, PayPal and Block were not sued by the plaintiffs. This may indicate that the plaintiffs believe the terms of said anti-competitive agreements were forced onto PayPal and Block.

Whether the two companies were strong-armed into the agreement or whether the terms were beneficial to both parties is up to the judge to decide.

The lawsuit also accuses Apple of banning crypto-related apps from its App Store, naming the Zeus Bitcoin wallets as an example. Dorsey-backed decentralized social networking app Damus was also threatened with removal from the App Store due to its tipping feature, although it was eventually allowed to stay on the platform.

The post Apple Sued for Limiting P2P Payments Via Crypto And Other Methods appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Read the full story: Read More“>

Blog powered by G6

Disclaimer! A guest author has made this post. G6 has not checked the post. its content and attachments and under no circumstances will G6 be held responsible or liable in any way for any claims, damages, losses, expenses, costs or liabilities whatsoever (including, without limitation, any direct or indirect damages for loss of profits, business interruption or loss of information) resulting or arising directly or indirectly from your use of or inability to use this website or any websites linked to it, or from your reliance on the information and material on this website, even if the G6 has been advised of the possibility of such damages in advance.

For any inquiries, please contact [email protected]