Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF provides much broader sector exposure with 404 holdings compared to the 76 positions in the State Street fund
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF offers significantly higher liquidity and a focus on the largest financial companies in the S&P 500
Both ETFs share an identical 0.08% expense ratio but Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF currently offers a higher trailing dividend yield
Financial sector ETFs provide efficient exposure to banks, insurance companies, and capital markets.
Investors may find Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (NYSEMKT:FNCL) appeals for its broader market coverage, while State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEMKT:XLF) offers unmatched liquidity and concentration in S&P 500 giants.
While both funds target the financial services space, they differ significantly in portfolio depth and market-capitalization focus. This comparison examines how these structural differences affect distribution potential, trading liquidity, and overall risk for long-term investors seeking to anchor their portfolios in diversified financial services.
| Metric | FNCL | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fidelity | SPDR |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| 1-yr return (as of June 18, 2026) | 9.6% | 8.3% |
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Beta | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| AUM | $2.18 billion | $49.4 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing 12-month distribution yield based on the June 18 closing price.
Both ETFs are highly efficient options for sector exposure, as they feature identical 0.08% expense ratios. However, the Fidelity fund provides a more generous payout for income seekers, yielding 1.7% compared to the 1.5% offered by the State Street fund, which may impact total return calculations over time.
| Metric | FNCL | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (25.7%) | (25.8%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,665 | $1,659 |
The State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF mirrors the Financial Select Sector Index, which targets the financial segment of the S&P 500. This narrow focus results in a concentrated portfolio of 76 holdings. Its largest positions include Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRKA) at 11.8%, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) at 11%, and Visa (NYSE:V) at 7.5%. Launched in 1998, it has 98% exposure to financial services and 2% to technology. It has a trailing-12-month dividend of $0.79 per share.
In contrast, the Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF tracks the MSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 Index and has 386 holdings, including small- and mid-cap firms. Its largest positions include JPMorgan Chase at 9.8%, Berkshire Hathaway at 7.8%, and Visa at 6.6%. Launched in 2013, the portfolio consists of 97% financial services, 2% technology, and 1% real estate. It has paid $1.26 per share over the trailing 12 months, reflecting its broader inclusion of dividend-paying companies across the market capitalization spectrum.
Even though the Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF and the State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF seek to passively track different indices, their historical performance is remarkably similar. In fact, their top 10 holdings are identical, although each fund assigns a different weight to the components.
When considering funds that focus on businesses focused on money, it’s best to evaluate them on the basics: which one will make you more money?
Fidelity’s offering, FNCL, bests State Street’s XLF on performance year-to-date (negative 4.8% to negative 5.3%), over the past 52-weeks (9.6% to 8.3%), the 3-year lookback (20.6% to 19.5%), the 5-year time frame (8.4% to 8.2%), and the 10-year lookback (8.4% to 8.2%)
Ultimately, those aren’t huge differences in performance, and the difference in dividend yield isn’t dramatic enough to suggest taxes should play a major consideration. If you’re investing for the long term, the fund with consistently better returns is the better buy. That fund here is FNCL, the Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Before you buy stock in Select Sector SPDR Trust – State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Select Sector SPDR Trust – State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $417,305!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,293,148!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 936% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 22, 2026.
JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Brendan Coffey has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, and Visa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
—
Blog powered by G6
Disclaimer! A guest author has made this post. G6 has not checked the post. its content and attachments and under no circumstances will G6 be held responsible or liable in any way for any claims, damages, losses, expenses, costs or liabilities whatsoever (including, without limitation, any direct or indirect damages for loss of profits, business interruption or loss of information) resulting or arising directly or indirectly from your use of or inability to use this website or any websites linked to it, or from your reliance on the information and material on this website, even if the G6 has been advised of the possibility of such damages in advance.
For any inquiries, please contact [email protected]
