Bitcoin miners sold a record 32,000 BTC in the first quarter of 2026 and signed about $70 billion in contracts to help power AI instead, marking the largest desertion by the group in the network’s history.
The exodus triggered Bitcoin’s first hash rate drop in six years, but it absorbed the shock and adjusted its difficulty, with the hash rate even recovering to a new high without missing a single block.
In a post published on X on July 6, analyst Shanaka Anslem Perera argued that Bitcoin has just passed one of the biggest real-world tests in its history after public mining companies, such as MARA, CleanSpark, Riot Platforms, Cango, Core Scientific, and Bitdeer, which were facing shrinking margins, sold more than 32,000 BTC in Q1 2026 and redirected that capital to build AI infrastructure.
For them, the math made sense, considering it cost about $80,000 to produce one BTC, a level that the cryptocurrency’s price has been below for most of this year. Meanwhile, they could earn 3 to 5 times that training AI, with multi-year contracts being dished out by the likes of Microsoft and Google instead of the lottery of block rewards.
“They did what any business would,” explained Perera. “BTC miners sold their Bitcoin, more in one quarter than all of last year, more than the industry dumped in the entire Terra collapse, and began converting their power plants into AI data centers.”
Now, remember, it has always been said that Bitcoin’s security depends on the miners who spend real energy to protect it, and with so many pulling out in such a short period, it felt like the system might crash. And for a few weeks, it teetered, with hash rate, the total computing power guarding the Bitcoin network, posting its first drop in six years, going down by around 4% to break a 5-year streak of double-digit growth.
However, according to Perera, the network did what its critics had forgotten it could do. It has a rule in its core that, when miners leave and blocks come slower, automatically makes mining easier and more profitable for those still plugged in.
So, as the deserters powered down, the math handed their reward to those who had stayed and to private operators who rushed in to fill the gap. Difficulty fell by 10% in some adjustments, one of the largest downward moves of the year, which pushed hash price back above $30 per petahash per second.
“The network that was supposed to depend on these miners just proved it never needed them,” the market commentator wrote, pointing out that Bitcoin’s hash rate even recovered to a new all-time high without any interruption to block production.
The lesson in all this, according to him, is Bitcoin’s resilience, absorbing “the single largest exit of its own miners” driven by the opportunity for profit elsewhere and never failing to produce a block every 10 minutes like it was designed to.
“The system was not weakened by desertion,” Perera concluded. “It was tested by it, and it passed.”
Elsewhere, as Perera celebrated BTC’s endurance, pseudonymous analyst Gaah noted that the Miner Cycle Stress Composite, which combines the Puell Multiple and the inverted Miner Capitulation Index, had fallen to new lows for 2026 and was in historically undervalued territory.
Similar readings were reportedly seen in 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024, during periods of severe miner stress and market bottoms, with the metric’s lowest possible reading of zero recorded in 2015, when BTC dropped by nearly 50%, going from about $300 to around $160 in less than seven days. According to the on-chain technician, the same pattern is now repeating.
The post How Bitcoin Survived Its Biggest Miner Walkout appeared first on CryptoPotato.
—
Blog powered by G6
Disclaimer! A guest author has made this post. G6 has not checked the post. its content and attachments and under no circumstances will G6 be held responsible or liable in any way for any claims, damages, losses, expenses, costs or liabilities whatsoever (including, without limitation, any direct or indirect damages for loss of profits, business interruption or loss of information) resulting or arising directly or indirectly from your use of or inability to use this website or any websites linked to it, or from your reliance on the information and material on this website, even if the G6 has been advised of the possibility of such damages in advance.
For any inquiries, please contact [email protected]
