Today's

top partner

for CFD

Despite operating separate order books, liquidity pools and user bases, Polymarket and Kalshi priced Spain’s chances of winning the World Cup at almost exactly the same probability ahead of Sunday’s final.

Polymarket priced Spain at roughly a 59% chance of lifting the trophy before kickoff, while Argentina traded near 40%. Kalshi’s market independently arrived at virtually the same assessment, pricing Spain at 59,6% and Argentina at 40.4%.

Different Markets, Identical Probabilities

The close alignment offered a rare illustration of how independent prediction markets with separate liquidity pools and user bases can arrive at similar probability estimates through trading alone.

That alignment emerged during the largest sporting event in prediction market history, with Polymarket’s World Cup Winner contract processing $4.28 billion in volume and Kalshi’s equivalent market another $1.29 billion.

The scale of trading makes the similarity in pricing particularly notable, even though the result of a single football match cannot determine whether those probabilities were perfectly calibrated.

Although the two markets reached nearly identical probabilities, trader positioning looked rather different. While traders often chased value on the underdog rather than backing the favourite, resulting in more capital flowing toward Argentina despite Spain’s higher implied probability, both platforms ultimately reflected nearly identical market expectations before the match.

No Widespread Profits

Blockchain analyst defioasis.eth examined more than 194,000 Polymarket wallets and found that roughly two-thirds ended the tournament with losses. Only five wallets generated profits exceeding $1 million, while the overwhelming majority of both gains and losses remained under $100.

One notable casualty was an Argentina supporter who lost a $1.23 million position in the final after previously sitting on more than $5 million in unrealized profit.

The record trading volumes were significant, but they were also largely expected. The tournament offered one of the clearest large-scale demonstrations yet of how prediction markets aggregate information through independent trading.

This article was written by Tanya Chepkova at www.financemagnates.com.

— CONTENT NOT MODERATED BY G6

— Please be careful with this content. If you don’t think it should be here, please get in touch with us at [email protected]

G6 is free to use portal to find ways to improve your life. We choose carefully posts and partner with the best in field writers to bring you the best content. Since 2006, we are there for you on your way to success.

Find on Facebook Follow on Instagram Connect on LinkedIn

Don't miss out on latest news

Join newsletter

Enable notifications

You got a story to share? Questions?

Just connect our team and let's see

©2006-2023 - All rights reserved - GSIX.ORG

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money

All Content on this site is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Site constitutes professional and/or financial advice, nor does any information on the Site constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content on the Site before making any decisions based on such information or other Content. In exchange for using the Site, you agree not to hold G6, Lecira, its affiliates or any third party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other Content made available to you through the Site.