Today's

top partner

for CFD

A group of over 40 U.S. lawmakers, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren, is demanding that federal regulators take immediate action to address the problem of insider trading on prediction markets.

Singapore Summit: Meet the largest APAC brokers you know (and those you still don’t!)

In a formal letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), lawmakers urged the agencies to issue clear guidance. They want federal employees to be reminded that using non-public government information to trade on these markets is illegal.

The letter is a direct response to a series of high-profile, suspiciously well-timed bets that have raised concerns about the use of classified or privileged information.

These bets include a $400,000 profit made by a user on the offshore platform Polymarket who correctly bet on the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro just hours before the event.


“Given the exponential growth in prediction market trading, [and] rising evidence suggesting possible governmental insider trading… we ask that the CFTC and OGE issue guidance reminding federal employees of their existing legal obligation,” the lawmakers wrote.

A Call for Formal Investigations and Proactive Measures

The letter goes beyond a request for guidance. Lawmakers are calling for a formal staff-level briefing and are asking whether the CFTC is already investigating cases involving federal employees, as well as what steps regulators are taking to detect and prevent such activity.

This push from Capitol Hill places additional pressure on the broader prediction market ecosystem, including regulated platforms such as Kalshi and the brokers and infrastructure providers building access to these markets.

From Grey Area to Enforcement Focus

The lawmakers’ letter explicitly states that under existing law (the STOCK Act), insider trading by federal employees on derivatives markets—which the CFTC says includes prediction markets—is already illegal.

However, they argue that in this “nascent” industry, the rules need to be explicitly clarified and enforced.

The CFTC itself has been moving in this direction, recently issuing its first advisory on prediction markets and noting that the prohibition on insider trading includes the “misappropriation of confidential information.”

For the B2B brokerage and fintech audience, this legislative push is a meaningful development. It signals that prediction markets are moving toward a more structured compliance environment, where the detection and prevention of insider trading is becoming a central requirement.

This article was written by Tanya Chepkova at www.financemagnates.com.

— CONTENT NOT MODERATED BY G6

— Please be careful with this content. If you don’t think it should be here, please get in touch with us at [email protected]

G6 is free to use portal to find ways to improve your life. We choose carefully posts and partner with the best in field writers to bring you the best content. Since 2006, we are there for you on your way to success.

Find on Facebook Follow on Instagram Connect on LinkedIn

Don't miss out on latest news

Join newsletter

Enable notifications

You got a story to share? Questions?

Just connect our team and let's see

©2006-2023 - All rights reserved - GSIX.ORG

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money

All Content on this site is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Site constitutes professional and/or financial advice, nor does any information on the Site constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content on the Site before making any decisions based on such information or other Content. In exchange for using the Site, you agree not to hold G6, Lecira, its affiliates or any third party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other Content made available to you through the Site.