Today's

top partner

for CFD

The latest inclusion in the CySEC MiCA register, payments company Unlimit, underscores the practical necessities of doing business in the EU. As Irene Skrynova, Chief Executive of Global Payments at Unlimit, pointed out in the announcement, operating crypto asset services in the bloc previously meant adhering to disparate local standards across jurisdictions. “Now there is one,” she said.

But MiCA is not all-encompassing.

While the regulation has provided a simplified cryptoasset framework, specific stablecoin activities remain firmly rooted within electronic money mandates.

The Overlap of Crypto Assets and Electronic Money

The European Commission has recently launched a public consultation on the functioning of the regulation.

It is standard practice for Brussels to review its homework.

A main complication cited by industry participants refers to issuing an e-money token, essentially a stablecoin.

To do so, companies will require an EMI license; Unlimint has long held one in Cyprus.

In practice, this puts stablecoins under the direct supervision of Central Banks.

The ECB’s Hard Stance

This regulatory division reflects broader policy tension across the eurozone.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has maintained a deeply sceptical stance toward private, euro-denominated stablecoins, with President Christine Lagarde repeatedly warning that widespread adoption could pose systemic risks to financial stability and weaken monetary policy transmission.

Rather than endorsing private stablecoin solutions, the ECB is prioritising the development of the digital euro as a public-money alternative.

For smaller players, the cost and complexity of regulatory compliance in Europe has already proven hard to absorb. Under MiCA alone, the compliance cull saw some 80% of crypto firms under national CASP regulations disappear.

Some of the bigger players also choose not to seek registration, notably Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin with a market capitalisation of between US$185 and 190 billion.

However, considering the ECB’s hard stance, reviewing the dual licensing requirement could be out of the question. .

This article was written by Adonis Adoni at www.financemagnates.com.

— CONTENT NOT MODERATED BY G6

— Please be careful with this content. If you don’t think it should be here, please get in touch with us at [email protected]

G6 is free to use portal to find ways to improve your life. We choose carefully posts and partner with the best in field writers to bring you the best content. Since 2006, we are there for you on your way to success.

Find on Facebook Follow on Instagram Connect on LinkedIn

Don't miss out on latest news

Join newsletter

Enable notifications

You got a story to share? Questions?

Just connect our team and let's see

©2006-2023 - All rights reserved - GSIX.ORG

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money

All Content on this site is information of a general nature and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the Site constitutes professional and/or financial advice, nor does any information on the Site constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content on the Site before making any decisions based on such information or other Content. In exchange for using the Site, you agree not to hold G6, Lecira, its affiliates or any third party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other Content made available to you through the Site.